Based on the initial studies published by GenderSAFE, this first policy brief provides higher education and research institutions and other stakeholders with insights into existing policy approaches on the zero-tolerance approach (Bondestam et al., 2024) and the needs of people in specific at-risk positions and situations (Michlová et al., 2024). Structured along the main components of the Zero-Tolerance Code of Conduct (European Commission, 2024), it provides actionable recommendations for institutions to develop cultures that recognise the structural nature of gender-based violence and take seriously all forms of gender-based violence, enforce compliance, foster trust, and by doing so, encourage a culture where victims/survivors feel supported to come forward.
Strong Deterrence
A zero-tolerance approach can be a strong deterrent against gender-based violence by ensuring all incidents are taken seriously and addressed with appropriate measures and sanctions. While some argue that such policies may be too severe and discourage reporting, the greater obstacle is the widespread failure of institutions to take meaningful action and enforce sanctions.
Clear Message
Many institutions fail to establish a consistent stance or provide clear information on reporting mechanisms, leading to uncertainty about what constitutes misconduct and where individuals can seek support. A zero-tolerance approach sends a clear message that all forms of gender-based violence are unacceptable.
Institutional Change
Gender-based violence is embedded in hierarchical power structures which often remain invisible. A zero-tolerance approach requires moving beyond treating gender-based violence as individual incidents and instead fostering institutional change: enhancing institution’s capacity for handling cases, addressing gaps in the provision of support and services, and embedding intersectionality at all levels.
Clarity of Intent
Adopting a zero-tolerance approach establishes a clear institutional stance and commitment to addressing gender-based violence. This contrasts with the widespread ambiguity in how institutions define misconduct, outline procedures, and communicate what constitutes a policy violation or how to report it (Michlová et al., 2024). Institutions must provide precise definitions and policy guidelines, ensure fair and impartial investigations, promote transparency, and prioritise the protection of victims and survivors.
Focus on Rehabilitation and Healing
Rehabilitation is a cornerstone of institutional change, addressing the root causes of gender-based violence while fostering institutional healing and sustained improvement. Traditional approaches often treat cases as individual failures without considering the systemic structures that enable such behaviours. Rehabilitation shifts this narrative by emphasising education, accountability, and prevention of future harm. This approach not only aims to prevent repeat offences but also promotes a broader cultural shift within the institution.
